Quite often, small companies don’t have the resources to hire the caliber of sales manager they really need. Instead, they either designate one of their senior salespeople to manage the team while continuing to sell, or they promote that person into a full-time sales manager role. All too frequently, neither approach works. That’s because it essentially means pulling one of your top producers off the line—the very place you need them most—and there’s no guarantee that a top producer will make a great coach. Yet coaching is one of the most important functions of the sales manager.

That’s when the business case for hiring a fractional sales manager makes sense, but there are other hidden costs that factor into the decision too. After all, the sales manager is an important member of the management team, responsible for ensuring there are enough sales activities to deliver a healthy pipeline and for coaching the rest of the sales team to improve their win rate. When so many sales opportunities end in “No Decision,” improving that win rate becomes the fastest way to drive better sales results—one of the key reasons effective sales coaching is so essential.

ineffective sales management costly

So, what are the real costs of having an ineffective sales manager—or no sales manager at all?

Lack of Skill Development:

Every professional team needs a coach if they are to deliver their best performance. The sales manager is responsible for coaching salespeople on their opportunities because that has a direct impact on revenue growth. Effective coaching starts with having a well-defined sales process—one that is proven, repeatable, and measurable. Yet the sales process alone is not enough, because every sales conversation is unique, and they’re not always linear. Buyer priorities shift, and the salesperson must be attuned to subtle changes in the buying decision process.
Research by Primary Intelligence showed that more than one-third of lost deals could have been won by taking a slightly different approach in the sales conversation. Presumably, many of those opportunities could have been won with more effective sales coaching, which could add significantly to top-line growth.

Insufficient Accountability:

The sales manager is responsible for ensuring a healthy pipeline, and that means holding salespeople accountable for their performance. When strong leadership is absent, sales activities drop and people don’t deliver their best work. That’s why weekly sales meetings are so important—they ensure the team is focused on the right prospects with enough activity to deliver results. Without that accountability, top-line growth won’t be what you need it to be.

Weakened Competitive Position:

Without a strong sales leader, a disproportionate number of competitive opportunities will be lost to other companies. Not only will this dampen sales growth, but it will also undermine team morale over time. Salespeople want to be part of a winning team. A hidden cost of poor sales leadership is the erosion of optimism that salespeople need to succeed, which puts them in an even tougher competitive position.

Increased Turnover:

If left unchecked long enough, ineffective development of the sales team undermines their success and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy that leads to higher turnover. The best performers will leave, and those who remain will become further discouraged. This makes increased turnover another hidden—and costly—consequence of poor sales management.

The challenge for many small businesses is that they don’t have the resources to hire the caliber of sales manager they need to drive results, or their sales force isn’t large enough to justify a full-time manager. That’s when it makes the most sense to consider enlisting a fractional sales manager.

“The reason many small organizations stay small is because they don’t dedicate the necessary resources of time and money in the sales leadership or sales management function.” — Anthony Iannarino